Category: Essays Examples on Literature

Frankenstein’s Anti-Enlightenment Theory. The Age of the Enlightenment considers knowledge power. This theory focuses mainly on science and reason. Romanticism began to take root shortly after 18th century. Many liberal activists and writers valued an era that stressed individualism, inspiration, as well subjectivity. Mary Shelley was the author of Frankenstein. She is also one of these writers.

Frankenstein’s actions show the flaws in Romanticism’s ideals. Shelley thought the Enlightenment was self-centered. This archetype is characterized by egotism as well as the belief that everything in the universe is good. The Enlightenment was a time for scientists to explore the limits of human knowledge and advance scientific reasoning. Many tried to discredit others’ natural abilities. Victor, a egotistical personality, is intended to represent an Enlightenment thought leader. Ingolstadt professors warn him not to ignore the consequences of his plans to create a superior, stronger, human-like creature. He believes that “a new species will bless me as its creator, source; many happy and outstanding natures would owe my existence to me” (page 40). Victor is punished for his shortsightedness in the end. Victor created the monster to symbolize Europe’s industrialization. The plot thickens and the monster commits a rebellion by killing Victor’s brother William. This is where the story reaches its climax. It shows what happens when you imitate God’s unique ability in creating life.

Victor doesn’t care about the consequences. Victor doesn’t consider the consequences of his actions. This helps Victor to realize what he really wants, that he is actually worth something. Victor is confronted by the monstrous in Montanvert and asks for a female. Victor creates a female version of the monster out of sympathy. Victor decides to not continue the project, a sign of Victor’s Romanticism. The monster vows to kill Victor and his family in response. Shelley, likewise, believes that Enlightenment was a failure that devalued the worth of the poor. The poor are represented in this novel by Elizabeth, Justine, as well as other women. The leading female characters of this novel, including Justine and Elizabeth, were not aware that Victor was created. They represent the ideal of Romanticism and the best that the world has to offer in love. Victor’s powerful women Elizabeth and Justine do not know the extent of Victor’s evil. They are not suffering.

The Age of the Enlightenment saw women and the poor as possessions. They were considered to be less socially well-off than the rich and men. Shelley debunks the notion that the monster can thrive only if he has a female counterpart. This novel examines society through a different lens. It is Shelley’s perception of female characters in Enlightenment societies, and the role they play in society. Robert Walton, however, is Frankenstein’s male lead character. Walton is the voice of reason in this novel. He helps Victor recover from his struggle with death and life. Victor’s tales about a monstrous creature who completely destroyed his life are told to him.

The Enlightenment is Victor’s nightmare. It destroys all good things and gives Victor knowledge that leads him to suffering. Mary Shelley was a famous English novelist who is known for her Gothic novels. Romanticism can cure this suffering by bringing individualism and inspiration to life.

Ethos and Logos. They are an integral part of literature and cannot be replaced. They were integral to the story’s emotional appeal and conviction, as well as the logic and logic. The author used Ethos and Logos in “Things fall apart” beautifully because he is African. He imagines how the village, culture, and many other aspects of Africa. What does Ethos and Logos mean for our world? The fictional world of “Things are Fall Apart” is a good example of how it can be close to the real world.

Our real world is closely interrelated with Frist of Ethos’ “Things Fall Apart”. On page 13, Okonkwo, who is the main character, describes how Okonkwo has to work every day on his plantation. The first page shows Okonkwo as “one our most fierce warriors since the founder fought a spirit or the wild for 7 days and 7 nights.” He sets up challenges to test character limits. The same applies in real life. You have to put your best foot forward to get the car you want or the food that you need. There are other examples of logos and Pathos that are still waiting. Okonkwo took responsibility for Ikemefuna’s care when he came to village. Okonkwo treated Ikemefuna the way he treated his own child and was proud of it. However, Okonkwo was not ready to complete Ikemefuna’s sentence. Okonkwo decides that he will go with Ikenefuna for the last time, before ending up being Ikenefuna’s killer. What does this all have to do Pathos. On page 63, Okonkwo expresses his regret by saying that he had “never tasted any food in two days” as well as not sleeping at night. This book is about creating a multi-faced character. He wants to be a multi-faced character. What does this have to do with the topic sentence? If you’ve ever lost someone close to you, or your loved one, you’ll understand how it feels. It can be a mixture of sadness, anxiety, and confusion. There’s one more.

The final thing is that How Logos of Things are relevant to the real world. Page 114 shows a village full of women cooking for a wedding. “It makes sense that someone needs to tend to the stoves regardless of anyone asking for help. How is this relevant to us? Well the author uses logos as a way to persuade you about normal logic.

This book, although fiction, shows us how close a fictional world can be to the real world. It is all about Logos, Ethos and Pathos. The author has created a story that allows him to create characters with depth through Pathos. This book is great. Although there are many similarities to real life, there are also many things that don’t apply to real life. For example, why would you kill your adopted son?

Cited Sources

Mengara, D. M. (2019). Colonial intrusion in Chinua Achebe’s Things fall apart: Stages of colonialism and colonialism. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/african-studies-review/article/abs/colonial-intrusion-and-stages-of-colonialism-in-chinua-achebes-things-fall-apart/A29545A66F1F4DB5036B8A6F160487B5 African Studies Review, 62(4), 31-56.

Okafor, C. (2003). Igbo Cosmology. The Parameters to Individual Accomplishment. Things Fall Apart. A Casebook of Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe (67-81). (https://books.google.de/books?hl=uk&lr=&id=rhHyKR-u1fMC&oi=fnd&pg=PA67&dq=Okafor,+C.+(2003).+Igbo+Cosmology+and+the+Parameters+of+Individual+Accomplishment+in+Things+Fall+Apart.+Chinua+Achebe%E2%80%99s+Things+Fall+Apart:+A+Casebook,+67-81.&ots=V5i3RcS8e6&sig=6drbTko1qH4e-FfmYFSJj14bfIs&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false)

Mogu, F. I. (2014). Things fall apart across cultures: The universal significance of Chinua Achebe’s 1958 reconstruction of Africa’s heritage. Annals of Humanities and Development Studies, 5(1), 69-79 (https://www.ajol.info/index.php/lwati/article/view/46521)

Jweid, A. N. A. A., & Abdalhadi Nimer, A. (2016). The Fall of National Identity: Chinua Achebe’s Everything Fall Apart. https://www.academia.edu/22120549/The_Fall_of_National_Identity_in_Chinua_Achebes_Things_Fall_Apart Pertanika Journal Social Sciences and Humanities, 24(1), 529-540.

Nancy Farmer wrote “The House of the Scorpion”, about Matteo Alacran. He actually is a clone of El Patron. Matt is disowned by his entire family, apart from the drug lord. However, he does love him as a pet. Cecilia acts as Matt’s caregiver at the “Big House”. Matt is not allowed to see any other children. The Alacrans treat Matt cruelly and El Patron is furious about Matt’s living circumstances. He orders him to be placed in a normal room. The ethical question surrounding Matt’s treatment starts to emerge at this point. Matt discovers a corpse in the Opium field. He actually finds an eejit. An eejit is a human slave with their own computer chip. Eejits were a horrible concept. It took away the human existence and individual choice. Matt fled Aztlan to Mexico in search of the ‘Lost Boys’ communism. Although it seems otherwise, the Keepers indulge in a variety of delicacies and the Lost Boys are restricted to plankton. Matt leads a rebellion against their government and dismantles it. Nancy Farmer sent messages to inform Matt about the corruption that has led to communist experiments around the world. Maria’s mother Esperanza was a champion for clones’ rights in America and told Matt that El Patron had died, Matt could officially become the leader of Opium. Clones fighting to secure civil rights in the United States are a major political and government step. This book portrays clones as an individual and should be treated accordingly. Matt returns to Opium in the hopes of shutting Opium down and restoring eejits back into human form.

Nancy Farmer wrote The House of the Scorpion, to reiterate her belief that civil right should be extended to all people regardless of origin. This belief is clearly illustrated by Senator Mendoza. He is the fictional senator from the book that advocates for clones and their human rights. Nancy Farmer stressed universal civil rights for all people. She also pointed out the differences between different governments. El Patron was the dictator of Opium’s government. El Patron even had computer-chip-equipped human slaves! The Lost Boys orphanage witnessed the failure of a communist government. The keepers had a corrupt view of fairness. The United States government remains in the background, secure and stable. Even our government is portrayed as supporting clone rights. Nancy Farmer is correct in her assertions. America would be the ideal place to launch a civil rights movement if it were a minority. Even though we may not be fully on board with ethical cloning yet, Americans believe in individualism and freedom. Clones should enjoy the same rights as humans. This book is a must-read. It’s eye-opening, insightful, and makes it possible to see the civil rights implications of such situations. You will be forced to consider how you treat others. It will be hard to put down the book and not hear its message about civil rights. It’s a fascinating book about the human condition. Additionally, it compares various governments by putting them beside each other. This book was a pleasure to read, and I recommend it highly to anyone.